≡ Menu

Gender-Neutral Language, Reverse Racism, and Law Review Strategies

Related:

In 1997 I published an article, “A Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Rights,” in the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. First, notice the title–it has “libertarian” in it. I have never been shy about my libertarian views, but knew that this might cause problems with a mainstream law review. So I submitted it as “A Theory of Punishment and Rights”. I had been through the law review process a few times for earlier articles, so I figured once the piece was accepted, near the end of the editing stage when I was dealing with the grunts, I could simply tell them to change the title at the last minute, and they would be making so many little changes this would not raise red flags. That strategy worked.

Also, I used masculine pronouns etc. but they tried to strip it all down to gender-neutral–changing “he” to “them” etc. I resisted and they caved, but for this sentence, ” It is impossible for him[27] to coherently and intelligibly assert…,” they added footnote 27, which read: “It is the general policy of the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review to use gender-neutral language. The author, however, has chosen not to conform to this policy.” (It’s now n. 33 in my chapter in my book. A Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Rights.)

Ha!

My other law journal story, The Enlightened Bar and Re: The Enlightened Bar (reprinted below) concerns an article of mine I submitted to the Texas Bar Journal. It was accepted, but the letter of acceptance informed me it could take up to a year to publish it–unless I was a minority, in which case they could scoot it to the head of the line. I was offended and withdrew it, published it (quicker) in another journal.

The Enlightened Bar

April 29, 2004

A couple years ago I clipped some pages from recent Texas Bar Journal issues that had me shaking my head. I planned to write up a little article for Lew on it, but never got ’round to it and there was not enough for an article anyway. Glory be, the Internet and blogs makes it possible now. I just came across it cleaning out some old paper files, so here it is. “The Back Page” is interesting because here, in a magazine for Texas’ tens of thousands of lawyers, one would expect news about law or lawyers, tips for lawyers, etc., but the headlines on that page include: “Attorneys Answer Call for Cell Phones” (donating old cell phones for battered women to help prevent domestic violence); “Siebert, Cisneros to Headline TMCP [Texas Minority Counsel Program],” and “Lawyers Provide Legal Help to Flood Victims.” And see the July 2001 Executive Report, “Protecting the Best Interests of our Children,” full of 3rd grade civics class platitudes about public education and democracy.Why should I be surprised? Just because it’s Texas doesn’t mean the legal establishment isn’t liberal and rotten to the core. This is the same journal to which I submitted an article back in July 1993–“Oilfield Indemnity and ‘Separate Insurance’ Provisions in the Wake of Getty Oil”; I got a letter back saying that accepted my article for publication and it might take 9-12 months, but that if I qualified for the “Affirmative Action Plan for Legal Publications Policy”–i.e. if I proved I was black or Hispanic–they would publish it within a couple months. In other words, if you’re white, you get moved to the back of the bus. I was so offended by the rudeness that I withdrew my article and published it elsewhere.

Re: The Enlightened Bar

Posted by Stephan Kinsella on April 13, 2005 01:14 PM

A while back I posted about political correctness infesting the Texas Bar. I noted there that back in 1993 I submitted an article entitled “Oilfield Indemnity and ‘Separate Insurance’ Provisions in the Wake of Getty Oil” to the Texas Bar Journal, which is distributed to tens of thousands of Texas attorneys. I got a letter back saying my article had been accepted for publication, but that it might take over a year to publish it–but “If you are a member of a recognized minority group, your article may be published in accordance with the affirmative action plan for legal article.” I.e., if I proved I was black or Hispanic, they would publish it within a couple months. In other words, if you’re white, you get moved to the back of the bus. I was so offended by the rudeness that I withdrew my article and published it elsewhere (the Texas Oil & Gas Law Journal).

I could not find the original correspondence when I made the referenced post, but I have just found the exchange.

Share
{ 2 comments… add one }

Leave a Reply

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, the content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication License.