[From my Webnote series]
Related:
- The Universal Principles of Liberty
- On Pushing the Button–the problem with magic
- The Limits of Armchair Theorizing: The case of Threats
- Ralph Raico, R.I.P.
- Haman: David Friedman, LiquidZulu, and two errors in understanding the Non-Aggression Principle
- On the Role of Commentators and Codes
- Epstein on Roman Law
- The Superiority of the Roman Law: Scarcity, Property, Locke and Libertarianism
- “Corpore Corpori”: “To the body”: Torts in the Roman Law
- Examples of Libertarian Law vs. Louisiana vs. French vs. Common Law: Consideration and Formalities
- Preface and Acknowledgments to Legal Foundations of a Free Society
- KOL456 | Haman Nature Hn 109: Philosophy, Rights, Libertarian and Legal Careers
- Reading Suggestions for Prospective/New Law Students (Roman/Civil law focus)
- Legislation and the Discovery of Law in a Free Society, ” in Legal Foundations of a Free Society [LFFS]
- PFP244 | Alessandro Fusillo, “Roman Law Reconsidered” (PFS 2022)
- See also discussion of the flagpole hypo in The Liberty Magazine Polls: 1988, 1999, and 2008: Flagpoles, Parental Obligations, Private Nukes
Any free society needs law—private law based on libertarian principles. This means that there is a need to identify and clarify our basic libertarian principles, and for law to develop to implement and apply these principles. As discussed in KOL345 | Kinsella’s Libertarian “Constitution” or: State Constitutions vs. the Libertarian Private Law Code (PorcFest 2021), any law code that libertarian theorists devise cannot be hyper-detailed and all-encompassing.
For one thing, many of the particular rules in a given setting will depend on contractual relationships and choices. Libertarian theorists, such as Rothbard, David Friedman, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, envision various territorial enclaves whose internal legal rules are based on local preferences, custom, and contract. For example, in Hoppe’s “covenant communities”: “a libertarian world could and likely would be one with a great variety of locally separated communities engaging distinctly different and far-reaching discrimination” (“e.g. nudists discriminating against bathing suits,” as Jeff Tucker points out in Idiot Patrol). 1 [continue reading…]
















Recent Comments