≡ Menu

Justin Raimondo, R.I.P.

As noted on Antiwar.com, libertarian stalwart and heroic antiwar activist Justin Raimondo has passed away at the age of 67, from lung cancer. He follows several other noted libertarian/adjacent thinkers who have died recently (at least among the ones I knew personally), such as Norman Stone (2019), Anthony de Jasay (2019), Ralph Raico (2016) and Tibor Machan (2016).

I didn’t know Justin well personally but I  encountered him from time to time at various libertarian events, and read a lot of his work over the years, such as Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (1993) and his numerous articles, almost all expressing strong anti-war or pro-libertarian sentiments, themes, or insights. I was often impressed by his strident, clear, forceful prose, and appreciated that it was informed by an obvious passion for liberty and a deep, scholarly knowledge of history and political philosophy.

I met Justin in person first at Mises Institute conference in the mid-late 1990s, probably 1995 or ’96. I had consumed and enjoyed his Reclaiming the American Right, but thought his thesis that Ayn Rand had “plagiarized” Garet Garrett’s novel The Driver for her novel Atlas Shrugged was frankly absurd or even contrived (I still do; it’s a ridiculous notion, as I noted on the Mises blog in 2007). I remember vividly. It was at the Auburn Hotel and Conference Center, between sessions. I walked up to Justin and introduced myself, and explained that I enjoyed his book but I thought his thesis about Rand “plagiarizing” Garrett was unfounded and exaggerated. He sputtered some outrage, refused to engage me, and stalked away. 1

I wish I had more to add, but that’s all I got. He was a very good writer and passionate about liberty. Would that this could be said about more people. At least the latter. Not everyone needs to be a writer. But more people need to be libertarians.

Update: I should mention that Justin wrote one of my favorite articles ever: his devastating review (Chronicles, June 1994) of David Horowitz’s annoying, self-serving memoir Radical Son.

Justin also appeared and spoke at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society, and he wrote about it in “Bodrum is Heaven,” in “Out and About,” Taki’s Magazine (June 16, 2008). His presentations at the 2008 PFS meeting are embedded below:

 

  1. Update: I just came across this piece by Kelley David Kelley responding to Raimondo. This was faxed to me by my friend Jack Criss. I agree with Kelley. See also the Wikipedia mention of Raimondo’s accusation, and this Quora post. []
Share
{ 0 comments }

Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights

“Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights” appears as chap. 6 of Legal Foundations of a Free Society (Houston: Papinian Press, 2023). It is an updated and revised version of a chapter in The Dialectics of Liberty: Exploring the Context of Human Freedom, Roger Bissell, Chris Sciabarra, and Ed Younkins, eds. (Lexington Books, 2019), which was itself based on my article “New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory,” J. Libertarian Stud. 12, no. 2 (Fall 1996): 313–26.

Original chapter and chapter from LFFS appended below.

Update: See “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” (2011) and Supplemental Resources. Also, Norbert Slenzok, The Political Philosophy of Hans-Hermann Hoppe: A Critical Study (2024) contains extensive discussion of argumentation ethics and other aspects of Hoppe’s and Kinsella’s social thought.

***

I just received my copy of the handsome new book The Dialectics of Liberty: Exploring the Context of Human Freedom, Roger Bissell, Chris Sciabarra, and Ed Younkins, eds. (Lexington Books, 2019), which is part of the “Capitalist Thought: Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics” series (available on Amazon and here).

This anthology includes my contribution in Chapter 5: “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights [PDF]” (a text version to be posted later after this work is incorporated into my forthcoming book, Law in a Libertarian World [now: Legal Foundations of a Free Society]), based on my article “New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory,” Journal of Libertarian Studies 12:2 (Fall 1996), updated including material drawn from other work: [continue reading…]

Share
{ 7 comments }

My article “What Libertarianism Is” was previously translated (by Lacombi Lauss) into (Brazlian) Portuguese as “O que é libertarianismo.”

In

Now a new translation, in Portugal Portuguese, by Carlos Novais, appears, with an introductory note, in a new book on libertarianism, Liberais À Solta!.

Share
{ 0 comments }

French Translation of Against Intellectual Property

Contre la Propriété Intellectuelle, a French translation of my  Against Intellectual Property, translated by Daivy Merlijs and Stéphane Geyres, is now available.

According to the translator, the previous French translation available was not complete. The present translation is complete and also has updated the dead URLs as footnotes using Wayback Machine.

Here are PDF, mobi, epub, and Word versions.

My gratitude toward the translators and publisher.

Vive la France and Vive la liberté!

***

An older translation, by Xavier Gillard, is also here: PDF; Amazon kindle.

***

Update: A commentary on and summary of the French translation of my monograph, by Marius-Joseph Marchetti, has been published here: Contre la propriété intellectuelle : un essai éclairant [Part 1], and Part 2, and is reprinted below (auto translation). See Marchetti: Against Intellectual Property: An Enlightening Essay.

***

My paste of the Word file is below: forgive formatting errors: [continue reading…]

Share
{ 1 comment }

Łukasz Dominiak has just published what looks to be an interesting paper, “The Problem of Axiomatic Status of the Self-Ownership Principled in the Libertarian Political Philosophy“. I say “looks to be” as it is in Polish. The English Abstract is below. I have included a link to this paper in my “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide” (2011) and Supplemental Resources.

Abstract

The subject-matter of the present paper is one of the fundamental theoretical bases of the libertarian political philosophy: the principle of self-ownership. Th e research problem of the paper is the following question: Is the self-ownership principle an axiom? The research method employed in the paper is the method of disputatio. Based on the conducted research, the paper proposes the affirmative thesis: the self-ownership principle is an axiom. The paper presents a conceptual framework that distinguishes between self-possession, selfownership, and the justifi cation of the latter. It also develops a line of argument which demonstrates that although prima facie only the self-possession is an axiom, self-possession necessarily implies selfownership, granting thereby the axiomatic status to the latter too.

Keywords: libertarianism, self-ownership, selfpossession, axiom, argumentation ethics, natural rights, natural law

Share
{ 2 comments }

This is the entire presentation “The Significance of Hans-Hermann Hoppe,” from the 2019 Austrian Economics Research Conference (AERC), at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on the occasion of Professor Hoppe’s 70th birth year. My notes, and a link to a longer talk on similar themes, are below.

Update: For related material, see also:Afterword to Hoppe’s The Great Fiction

Related: KOL259 | “How To Think About Property”, New Hampshire Liberty Forum 2019

 

[continue reading…]

Share
{ 0 comments }

Lightly edited interchange with a (non-native English-speaking) friend on Facebook who had some questions about Hoppe’s argumentation ethics. Let’s call him “Raphael”.

Raphael: Hello Kinsella. I have a legitimate doubt about Hoppe’s ethics. One of the premises of Hoppe’s ethics is that any assertion can only be justified in an argumentation. That is, in a propositional exchange between individuals. But the question is, when the individual writes an article, or lecture, is he not justifying assertions without arguing with another individual?  FEB 19, 2019, 11:48 PM

Stephan: The idea is simply that justification is argumentative justification. This is undeniable since if people disagree in this they are arguing .  FEB 20, 2019, 8:19 AM [continue reading…]

Share
{ 5 comments }

The Dialectics of Liberty: A New Anthology is On The Way!

Update: See “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights” in The Dialectics of Liberty.

As announced today by political philosopher Chris Matthew Sciabarra, in his post “The Dialectics of Liberty: A New Anthology is On The Way!“, a new book is forthcoming this year from Lexington Books on “the dialectics of liberty.” This anthology is coedited by Roger E. Bissell, Sciabarra, and Edward W. Younkins, and includes a chapter by yours truly on “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights.”

From Chris’s announcement:

It is my distinct honor—and pleasure—to formally announce a forthcoming book: The Dialectics of Liberty: Exploring the Context of Human Freedom, a trailblazing collection of essays by a diverse group of scholars, coming from a variety of disciplines and perspectives. The anthology has been coedited by Roger E. Bissell, Chris Matthew Sciabarra, and Edward W. Younkins. It is slated for publication by Lexington Books in June 2019 and it is sure to be a provocative read for anyone interested in liberty and the contexts that nourish—or undermine—it.

Readers can find the book’s home page here (which is redirected from both Dialectics of Liberty.com and Dialectics and Liberty.com). As we state on our abstracts page:

“These essays explore ways that liberty can be better defended using a dialectical approach, a mode of analysis that grasps the full context of philosophical, cultural, and social factors requisite to the sustenance of human freedom. The contributors represent a variety of disciplines and perspectives who apply explicitly dialectical tools to a classical liberal / libertarian analysis of social and cultural issues. By conjoining a dialectical method, typically associated with the socialist left, to a defense of individual liberty, typically associated with the libertarian right, this anthology challenges contemporary attitudes on both ends of the political spectrum.Abstracts for all the articles that are included in the anthology can be found here and contributor biographies can be found here.”

Share
{ 1 comment }

Anthony de Jasay, R.I.P.

Libertarian scholar Anthony de Jasay (1925–2019) has just passed away (the last significant libertarian scholars to die were Ralph Raico and Tibor Machan, who passed in 2016). Not very well known by non-academic libertarians, Jasay was the author of a number of important libertarian works, including Choice, Contract, Consent: A Restatement of Liberalism (1991), The State (1985), and Against Politics: On Government, Anarchy, and Order (1997). He was also the subject of a well-deserved festschrift, Ordered Anarchy: Jasay and his Surroundings (2007), edited by Hardy Bouillon and Hartmut Kliemt.

[continue reading…]

Share
{ 0 comments }

I just received my paper copy of The Uniqueness of Western Law: A Reactionary Manifesto, by English anarchist libertarian legal scholar Richard Storey. I haven’t read it yet, but this handsomely-produced volume looks interesting and adds to the growing collection of introductions or primers to libertarian thought, which include, as I noted in my Foreword to Chase Rachels’s A Spontaneous Order, other recent works such as: Jeffrey A. Miron’s Libertarianism, From A to Z (2010), Jacob Huebert’s great Libertarianism Today (2010), 1 Gary Chartier’s The Conscience of an Anarchist (2011), Gerard Casey’s superb Libertarian Anarchism (2012), Keir Martland’s Liberty from a Beginner: Selected Essays (2nd ed., 2016), and Todd Seavey’s Libertarianism for Beginners (2016).

 

  1. See my post The Best Introduction to Libertarianism Ever []
Share
{ 1 comment }

Common Law Court and Militia Nut Material from the 1990s

See Conspiracy Libertarians, Waystation Libertarians, Activists vs. Principled Libertarians

I lived in the Philadelphia area from 1994–97 and while there I associated a bit with local libertarian or related groups. For example I spoke a couple of times at the Philadelphia chapter of the Federalist Society. I also attended a few meetings of the Freeman Society of Valley Forge, which was run by my friend and free market economics professor John McGinnis. My recollection is that the Freeman Society was sponsored by or somehow affiliated with the Foundation for Economic Education, which published the magazine The Freeman. [continue reading…]

Share
{ 0 comments }

Portuguese translation of “How We Come To Own Ourselves”

Como nos tornamos donos de nós mesmos, Portuguese translation of How We Come To Own Ourselves

Share
{ 0 comments }

© 2012-2026 StephanKinsella.com CC0 To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to material on this Site, unless indicated otherwise. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.

-- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright