Podcast (kinsella-on-liberty): Play in new window | Download (Duration: 51:13 — 43.5MB)
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 357.
I was a guest recently on Peter Quiñones’ show Free Man Beyond The Wall, Episode 631 (Sept. 15, 2021). From his shownotes:
Pete and Stephan discuss the Constitutionality of Biden’s vaccine mandate and then get into discussions about Hoppe’s plan for local politics and how it can fight against overreach by the Feds.
I post this from Bodrum, Turkey, at the 2021 PFS meeting, watching Saif Ammous talk about bitcoin. The internet is wonderful.
Grok shownotes:
In this episode of the Free Man Beyond the Wall podcast, host Pete Quinones welcomes back patent attorney and author Stephan Kinsella to discuss pressing libertarian issues, starting with Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate announced in September 2021 (1:00-3:39). Kinsella critiques the mandate as unjust and potentially unconstitutional, predicting a 60% chance it survives legal challenges, though it may be struck down as illegal under current OSHA rules. The conversation explores the broader implications of federal overreach, contrasting it with state-level responses like Florida’s resistance under Governor DeSantis, which Kinsella views as strategically preferable despite its own libertarian shortcomings (5:02-9:20). They also touch on the cultural mania surrounding COVID policies, with Quinones expressing shock at public compliance and Kinsella noting the temporary nature of these measures compared to enduring state injustices like war and taxation (15:01-20:05).
Transcript and grok analysis/summary below.
-
Description: The episode begins with a promotional segment for Richard Grove’s Autonomy course, followed by Quinones introducing Kinsella, a patent attorney and author of Against Intellectual Property. They dive into Biden’s vaccine mandate, announced in September 2021, discussing its constitutionality and potential legal outcomes.
-
Summary:
-
Promotion of Richard Grove’s Autonomy course, highlighting its value for navigating current challenges (0:00-0:49).
-
Quinones introduces Kinsella and outlines the episode’s focus on Biden’s mandate, its constitutionality, state nullification, and broader libertarian topics (1:00-1:44).
-
Kinsella shares his travel plans to Bodrum, Turkey, for a libertarian event, setting a casual tone (1:57-2:43).
-
Discussion on Biden’s mandate begins, with Kinsella calling it outrageous but noting OSHA’s history of overreach; he predicts a 60% chance it survives but may be struck down as illegal (2:48-3:39).
-
Quinones describes the mandate as part of a broader “insanity” over the past 18 months, citing public compliance and cultural shifts (3:47-4:49).
-
-
Description: The conversation deepens into the libertarian critique of federal and state interventions, comparing Biden’s mandate with DeSantis’ counter-policies in Florida. They explore the cultural mania surrounding COVID policies, with Quinones sharing personal experiences and Kinsella reflecting on vaccine skepticism and Twitter’s role in amplifying hysteria.
-
Summary:
-
Kinsella critiques both Biden’s mandate and DeSantis’ fines on businesses requiring vaccines as unlibertarian, but sees federal overreach as the greater threat (5:02-6:09).
-
Quinones laments the erosion of private property rights and shares horror stories from lockdown experiences, contrasting Georgia’s reopening with California’s prolonged restrictions (6:15-7:40).
-
Kinsella proposes nullification as a bold state strategy, citing Tom Woods, and criticizes praising governors for granting natural rights (7:48-9:20).
-
Discussion of culture wars, with businesses caught in political crossfire; Quinones references Hoppe’s insights on societal division (9:20-10:45).
-
Quinones recounts his severe COVID experience at Porkfest, expressing skepticism about vaccines but no regrets; Kinsella shares his milder case and vaccine choice (10:51-13:04).
-
They discuss vaccine skepticism, with Kinsella citing a doctor’s caution about mRNA technology; Quinones questions the rush to vaccinate without knowing COVID’s origins (13:13-14:54).
-
Twitter’s role in amplifying mania is debated, with Kinsella seeing it as a symptom of broader societal issues (14:54-15:01).
-
-
Description: The hosts analyze the long-term societal and economic impacts of COVID policies, including inflation and debt. They advocate for Hoppe’s localist solutions, discussing the plight of small businesses and the potential of Bitcoin to curb government spending.
-
Summary:
-
Kinsella views COVID policies as temporary compared to permanent state harms like war and IP; hopes for fatigue to end mandates, citing international variations (15:01-16:55).
-
Quinones notes public enthusiasm for mandates, suggesting empty lives find purpose in compliance; Kinsella sees mandates as punitive rather than protective (17:02-19:23).
-
They discuss authoritarian rhetoric from figures like Leana Wen, fueling conspiracy theories about vaccine motives; Kinsella predicts “herd immunity” may be erased from discourse (19:29-20:54).
-
Economic concerns arise, with Quinones highlighting inflation from excessive spending; Kinsella agrees, blaming the Federal Reserve (20:54-22:00).
-
Hoppe’s What Must Be Done is cited as a guide for local political action, advocating for decentralized “Liechtensteins” over immediate privatization (22:00-22:45).
-
Small businesses’ struggles under conflicting mandates are discussed; Kinsella critiques Massie’s contractor workaround as impractical (22:45-25:34).
-
Corporate restructuring to evade regulations (e.g., Obamacare) is noted, but Kinsella warns of bureaucratic adaptability (25:34-27:05).
-
Bitcoin’s potential to limit government spending is praised, forcing fiscal restraint and rational policy (27:05-28:57).
-
Promotion of the Nomad Network, a liberty-focused community for entrepreneurship and networking (29:03-30:14).
-
-
Description: The conversation turns to global COVID responses, particularly Australia’s authoritarianism, and the potential for U.S. secession. They delve into Hoppe’s vision of covenant communities, natural elites, and the left-right divide, emphasizing decentralized order over egalitarian chaos.
-
Summary:
-
Quinones questions the global coordination of COVID responses, dismissing Trump-centric conspiracies; Australia’s police brutality shocks them (30:14-31:25).
-
Kinsella contrasts U.S. constitutional limits with Commonwealth countries’ lack thereof, citing The Handmaid’s Tale to highlight state power (31:25-32:59).
-
Canada’s authoritarian potential is discussed, restrained by U.S. proximity and rural resistance (32:59-34:05).
-
Secession’s likelihood grows, with Quinones predicting a U.S. breakup in his lifetime; Kinsella sees federalism as a hopeful sign (34:05-36:15).
-
Critique of centralist libertarians (e.g., Objectivists) who oppose state sovereignty; Kinsella favors Hoppe’s decentralized enclaves (36:15-38:30).
-
Hoppe’s covenant communities are defended as inevitable under anarchy, ensuring law and order through private institutions (38:30-40:23).
-
Discussion of voluntary segregation and diverse enclaves as natural outcomes of freedom, citing U.S. ethnic neighborhoods (40:23-41:20).
-
Quinones aligns with Hoppe’s view of the right as order-driven (hierarchy) versus the left’s chaotic egalitarianism; Kinsella agrees, emphasizing natural hierarchies (41:20-44:37).
-
-
Description: The final segment focuses on Hoppe’s concept of natural elites as community leaders in a stateless society. They reflect on the future of COVID policies, predicting regional differences, and address divisive libertarian issues like IP, abortion, and borders.
-
Summary:
-
Hoppe’s What Must Be Done and natural elites are discussed; Kinsella defines them as trusted experts in various fields, essential for dispute resolution and social order (45:00-47:37).
-
Quinones predicts regional divergence, with blue states prolonging mandates; Kinsella remains cautiously optimistic, citing vaccine uptake and Delta’s impact (47:37-49:12).
-
Kinsella plugs his websites (stephankinsella.com, c4sif.org) and expresses interest in Quinones’ post-libertarianism, planning future discussion (49:12-49:34).
-
Divisive libertarian issues (IP, abortion, borders) are briefly addressed; Kinsella sees IP as clear-cut, abortion as intractable, and borders as unsolvable under a welfare state, advocating anarchy (49:34-50:38).
-
Episode concludes with thanks and a promise of future episodes (50:45-50:57).
-
My Grok prompt: For the following podcast episode https://stephankinsella.com/as_paf_podcast/kol357-free-man-beyond-wall-ep-631-quinones-bidens-mandate/ and accompanying youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFYMO6wzO8c, using also links provided in that episode and other commentary in that episode, using the transcript time markers, provide (1) a 2 paragraph summary of the conversation in the video, for use as shownotes, with time markers; (2) a summary of the conversation in the video, for use as shownotes, with bullet points and time markers and a description and summary for each 5 to 15 minute block of time in the video. Also consider https://x.com/PeterRQuinones/status/1918899681574158795 and https://x.com/NSKinsella/status/1918907574419624105 and https://x.com/NSKinsella/status/1918907269556638017 and https://x.com/NSKinsella/status/1918604845537214470.
Summary of the tweets from Chatgpt:
Here is a detailed breakdown of the disagreement between Stephan Kinsella and Peter R. Quinones based on their posts on X:
🔥 BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Stephan Kinsella, a leading libertarian theorist best known for his work on intellectual property and rights theory, takes a strong deontological and Rothbardian/Hoppian approach grounded in the non-aggression principle (NAP), self-ownership, and private property ethics.
Peter R. Quinones, associated with post-libertarian or dissident right movements, often criticizes what he sees as the impotence, inaction, or abstraction of traditional libertarianism. He has increasingly endorsed power-oriented strategies and right-authoritarian realpolitik to resist progressive/state overreach.
This exchange reveals a deeper philosophical divide between principled libertarianism and post-libertarian praxis.
📍 KINSELLA’S INITIAL POST
Tweet ID: 1918604845537214470
Kinsella criticizes certain ex-libertarians or “post-libertarians” as being hypocrites. His language is sharp:
“They just want to be the new thugs in charge. They reject the NAP, reject rights, but still pretend they’re moral or principled.”
He frames their position as one of shallow pragmatism—people who are no longer truly libertarian, yet still want to claim a kind of ethical superiority. He paints them as disgruntled libertarians who now want to “do unto others as was done unto them”, weaponizing state or community power under the guise of “fighting fire with fire.”
He labels them as:
- “way-station libertarians”
- “thuggocrats”
- Advocates of a might-makes-right mentality
- Embracers of state-like aggression from a different direction
Main idea: Using aggression to fight aggression is not libertarianism—it’s just shifting which gang is in charge. Even if state overreach is real, the moral response is not to mimic its methods.
🧱 PETER R. QUINONES’ RESPONSE
Tweet ID: 1918899681574158795
Quinones claps back with disdain. Without naming Kinsella directly, he posts:
“The people who still use the term libertarian to describe themselves and use it as a cudgel against people who want to actually get something done are the biggest hypocrites in the world.”
He accuses these self-described libertarians of being ineffectual—people who:
- Cling to ideology without real-world effect
- Use their “purity” as a cover for fear, risk aversion, or inaction
- Critique others for trying new strategies (even if imperfect or illiberal)
Underlying message: If “libertarianism” means standing by and moralizing while society crumbles or totalitarianism rises, then it’s not worth preserving. He seems to view attempts at principled consistency as hollow and counterproductive in the current environment.
🎯 KINSELLA’S FOLLOW-UP CLARIFICATIONS
Tweet IDs: 1918907269556638017 and 1918907574419624105
Kinsella issues two sharp rejoinders:
- First follow-up:
“When I say some of the post-libertarian types are hypocrites, I mean they rail against woke-ism, covid authoritarianism, the state, big pharma, all kinds of tyranny… but then they turn around and advocate, praise, or wink at using state-like or aggressive force themselves.”
He argues that even if your enemies are using unjust means, you don’t get to fight back using the same immoral tools. Otherwise, you’re not resisting tyranny—you’re becoming a new version of it.
- Second follow-up:
“There are ways to oppose the state, pharma, WEF, wokism, etc., that do not require becoming the monster you claim to fight. The right response is not to coerce better; it’s to withdraw consent, decentralize, use persuasion, nullification, and live outside the system.”
This invokes Hoppean ideas of decentralization and covenant communities—but consistent with libertarian ethics. He distinguishes between legitimate resistance (secession, disobedience, parallel institutions) versus domination or “based authoritarianism.”
🔍 DEEPER PHILOSOPHICAL DISAGREEMENT
Theme | Kinsella’s View | Quinones’s View |
---|---|---|
Use of Power | Any use of coercion outside of defensive property rights is immoral and self-defeating | Using coercion may be justified to fight worse coercion or reclaim control from enemies |
Moral Consistency | Non-aggression is the bedrock of liberty—even when inconvenient | Moral purity is a luxury; bold action is needed in times of cultural/political decay |
Effectiveness | Power achieved by betraying principles is illusory and dangerous | Without willingness to wield power, libertarians will remain irrelevant and mocked |
Ideological Identity | Libertarianism = non-aggression, self-ownership, private law ethics | “Libertarianism” has failed; a new right-wing realism is needed |
Strategy | Withdraw consent, nullify, build parallel institutions | Seize or support power structures to push back against left-authoritarianism |
🧩 CONCLUSION
- Kinsella represents a principled, Rothbardian/Hoppian continuity: no compromise with aggression, ever. He believes libertarianism is a cohesive ethical theory, not just a policy toolkit.
- Quinones represents a post-libertarian, anti-purity posture: moralism without power is impotence, and old libertarianism is unsuited to the existential struggle of our time.
The disagreement is not merely tactical—it’s foundational. One side sees ethical consistency as the precondition of liberty; the other sees ethical flexibility as necessary to protect civilization from collapse.
Transcript
people people people richard Grobe is starting season six of his autonomy
course and you really should be there i don’t think I could have gotten through the last 16 months of this world without
the skills that Richard Grove gave me so head on over to freemanbyondtheall.comutonomy
check it out there’s two links there one’s to an overview of the course another is to a 19 skills PDF download
go check out that video sign up for the course and get on Richard’s level thank
you [Music]
[Music]
hello everyone i want to welcome you to the Free Man Beyond the Wall podcast this is your host Pinz i invited Stefan
Consella to return to the show stefan is a patent attorney and he wrote the book
against intellectual property i asked Stefan to come on and answer some
questions about Joe Biden’s mandate how constitutional he thinks it is what he
thinks is going to happen with it does he think that states are going to nullify it and then we’re just going to
start talking about a host of subjects we’re going to get into some hapa we’re going to get into some local politics
and we just get into a conversation like we normally have when we’re talking by ourselves
so without any further delay here is Stefan Canella
canella my man how are you doing i’m doing well how you doing good man let’s just jump right in because you are I am
so jealous of where you are leaving to go tonight uh you want to tell everybody i’m heading tonight to uh Bodum Turkey
through Istanbul with uh several of my friends are going too greg Moran from
Atlanta and Juan Carpio from Ecuador u who you know I think you met some
Anthony Samuroff um is going too and lots of Sedina Moose is going um of
course Hans will be there ho will be there so uh yeah this may be my 10th time we started this in 2006 I believe i
missed a few because of kid issues but um we missed last year of course because of COVID so I think it’s a truncated
group this year because of COVID we’ll see when I get there it could be smaller more intimate but anyway I’m I’m looking forward to it cool making plans for next
year wish I was one of that group okay so let’s just jump right in what are you
making of this mandate last week that Biden came up with and what do you think
the courts are going to say about it i haven’t I I don’t know i mean my first
impulse is that it’s outrageous of course but then you know there’s lots of things the state has done the last 200
years which are outrageous and they just didn’t get reported as much because it was before the internet i mean I’m not
so sure that uh it’s beyond OSHA’s purview because everything else OSHA does is insane too um
the best theory I’ve heard is that it will be struck down as illegal but not unconstitutional so uh Congress will
have to revise the OSHA rules or something like that to let them do this but I wouldn’t bet on it i’d say there’s
a 60% chance it will it will it will survive um which which is crazy i think
it’s totally unjust and unlbertarian and um I would say unamerican but apparently it’s not what do you think
completely insane i mean we’ve gone off the rails in 18 months if you would have told me back in January of last year
half the things that have happened people people have embraced and talked about federalism
the governor of California re referred to California as its own nation and then
that people would just not only comply Yeah with what every
with everything but become warriors for it almost like you know hey you know my
grandfather fought in World War II and he did his part and this is me doing my part and you know all I need to do is
stay home or yeah wear a mask and scallop people who aren’t wearing masks
or get this vaccine that you know I mean just a a strange mania has overtaken the
nation i don’t understand why because we’ve had previous pandemics and we didn’t have this happen maybe it just
Jeff Tucker and others have tried to explain why i still don’t quite get it but um I’m not quite as I mean I’m not
as much of a vaccine skeptic I think as some other people so I mean I’m still as a libertarian I’m against all the policy
issues the same way as you uh you and I had a little maybe disagreement on the Florida thing uh and the interesting
that happened before this Biden thing so my first thought was I guess I spoke too soon opposing Dantis but the
more I thought about it I still think I I’m back to my original view so in both cases you have the the federal
government trying to tell businesses what to do they’re trying to tell them you have to insist that employees are
vaccinated and in Dantis’ case he’s telling them what to do he’s saying you cannot request that or you cannot uh
require your employees to be vaccinated so technically they’re both unlbertarian
right but of course you know I guess you’re looking at it from more strategic or overall forest for the trees point of
view which one is really worse we know which one’s the big enemy as always it’s the federal government and the central state and in this case you know it’s
worse to force people to inject the vaccine into their body than to uh suffer a fine for asking your employees
to you know prove that they’re vaccinated I guess so I guess that’s how I come down on it but I still think
they’re both unlbertarian I guess is my my my my perspective yeah I think it and
I agree i mean private property is not is just out the
window at this point i mean correct the idea of it and I just look at what what’s more
strategic at this point so when you have when you have 18 months of insanity
and you’ve seen people suffer and you’ve I mean I I know p personal horror
stories that I I don’t even I don’t even talk about because I don’t have permission to talk about them and
you just look and you’re like okay so you know I was in Georgia up until recently i left Georgia and moved to the
Midwest um a couple months ago and Georgia came out of it and last week in
April last year said businesses can reopen if they want to and a lot of businesses reopen and stayed open um
cities did mandates which you know is really not I’d rather cities do mandates
than states you know the smaller you can get with the mandates the better you know so decentralized yeah yeah yeah and
just watching what happened down there and then hearing stories from friends in
California who are like look I’ve been we’re still locked down you know it’s like 12 months later we’re still locked
down 13 months later we’re still locked down it’s just like well I
You’re gonna have to try to do something politically absolutely and it’s going to be unlbertarian you know it’s not maybe
i mean you had I think Thomas Massie recommending civil disobedience which I think may be one way to go um you know
one thing I was posting on Twitter with all these libertarians favoring Dantis and I understand that you’re grasping at
any straw but Dantis is no you know it’s kind of pathetic that we we we praise
these governors for letting us do things right that we have a natural right to do
in Texas and in Florida these guys are not really on our side uh they’re just not as bad as the federal government but
what I was thinking was you know if you really were ballsy and had a sincere radical approach and wanted a strategy
um you ought to favor Dantis pulling a Tom Woods nullification thing and saying “Listen we’re we’re not just going to
we’re not going to find employers employers for for asking this they can do whatever they want but we think a lot
of them are asking for vaccination because of pressure from the feds we’re going to protect them from that pressure by interposing right doing a
nullification thing saying we’re going to use our state sovereignty we’re going to step step up to the bat and we’re
going to protect you from any penalties from the federal government in other words try to be ballsy and do a little
quasi secession thing and say “Listen the federal rules are null and void here
you do not have to comply with the federal rules you don’t have to ask your employees to get a vaccine we’re going to protect you.” I don’t know how you do
that i don’t know if it’d be successful but at least it would be a a valiant attempt i would think that’d be way
better than punishing employers for asking for vaccines
yeah I mean I agree with you 100% i can’t I can’t argue with you you know I know my I know my property my private
property principles i think we’re I thought you were going to say you know your place no oh god damn just joking
getting a heavy weight on here i got to be careful um but you know I think Dancis is also well
aware that he’s in the middle of a culture war and that a lot of these businesses are against him just because
he’s a Republican right just because he’s against this and in the middle of a
culture war what happens is people tend to any chance that they can get to
punish their enemies are going to take it yeah and I think that’s that’s where we’re at you know and considering that
this culture war you know and I mean you’ve you’ve studied enough Hapa and
when you see a culture war happening especially like what’s happening now okay so everything that’s happening in
the culture is absolutely insane people can’t tell what’s up or down anymore a lot of people are just they’re just
existing at this point and you have a tendency to go one way or the other and
it’s real easy to take sides and be like “Okay the left is ab the left is in
charge they control everything they control the media they control the institutions they control academia they
control big tech then let’s punish I’m all for punishing them as much as
possible even on a personal level because and it’s kind of hard to argue
against that because it’s just a a human emotion that you know it’s like all
right these people would want to destroy me you I mean these people want to like I mean I got I was one of the ones at
Porkfest that got sick and I got it bad I got it I had it for like two and a half three weeks where I was down where
I was down and I went through it i came through it i feel very confident from
what I’ve seen out of Israel that any kind of future I’m pretty well protected
against any kind of future outbreak and and um let me ask you a question i don’t
want you to hold me down and put and put the you know these people want people to hold people down and stick needles in
their arms and that to me is the enemy do you have any personal regrets about not getting the vaccine beforehand in
other words do you think that being vaccinated would have made your experience um not as bad
it probably would have made my experience not as bad but I still don’t regret it i’m still glad that I went
through it because I went through it probably as bad as
anyone that I’ve heard and Oh no no have you talked to Justin justin Arand arman
oh no no no no i mean I’m I went through of people that I’ve talked to okay and
I’m glad to be able to tell the story i’m glad to be able to say “Yeah I’m I’m overweight i’m over 50 and I pulled
through this thing and I’m fine.” Yeah you know and I can go up and down i can do all the same things I used to do
before it without any suffer without any suffering and everything and I don’t know man i just think that
this f this vaccine is going to turn into a flu vaccine it’s going to be like a yearly thing or a seasonal thing and I
never had a flu vaccine in my life you know and it just I I don’t know it’s just I’m a hard-headed prick you know
well yeah i mean I got to say I’m kind of glad I got I got it too after Portf Fest but I was vaccinated but um but my
case was very mild but I’m glad I got it because um I do have antibodies i’ve
checked and uh I’m going to Turkey tonight so I think the risk of me getting it while I’m there which would result in some kind of bizarre
quarantine or lockdown is reduced so I’m glad I got it um but I’m also glad I was vaccinated first but um but I understand
like you don’t want to do it if people tell you to do it even if it’s a good idea like you want to spite them right u
But everyone’s got a different opinion on this and that’s what that’s the way the world should be right some people are antivaccine like you are some people
say “I’m not antivaccine i’m just anti this vaccine right or I’m anti this vaccine right now.” I’ve had a tetanus
shot i had a tetanus shot a few years ago i’m not completely antivaccine i’m
just looking at this thing and it’s like I’m just like they were calling for a vaccine from
this like right from the start you know and I’m just like well wait a minute can we find out what this is for we don’t
even know where this came from right now yeah and it’s like we don’t know the origin of it we don’t know if it’s lab
lab made if it was gain of function if it came from a bat or a pengalin or whatever and it’s like I’d like to know
these things first you know and then talking to Ken Wakowski who is a
mainline doctor worked for Hoover University for years and years and years
has every vaccine known to mankind in his body has taken it into his body and
then when he heard about this he’s like I like the he said mRNA technology is
going to be the future he goes I’m just not going to get this vaccine right now because I need to see more testing on it
yeah yeah yeah and that you know that was that’s that sounds way too reasonable yeah yeah yeah i know yeah
it’s like that you know I had dinner it’s not like I I know the guy over Skype i had dinner or Zoom i had dinner with the guy i think I looked in his
eyes you know but that contradicts some of the Twitter advice by Joy Reid on on on Twitter so it’s got to be
unreasonable what do you think of all this and how much of a how much of an influence do
you think that like the insanity that goes on on Twitter carries out into the
real world i mean I think Twitter is more of a symptom than a cause but I guess it it
goes both ways um we do have this weird mania now and I do think that we’re
having I thought a year or two ago we had peak peak SJW or peak panic uh what
do you peak cancel culture but it looks like it’s just getting worse it’s got to reach a peak at some point look my view
on the co thing is same similar to yours i think the lockdowns have been horrible the the the mask mandates have been
stupid and horrible um the social distancing is stupid and horrible all of it’s been horrible um but I got to
believe as bad as it is it’s temporary um because I think we’re going to have fatigue at some point because we’re I
just don’t think everyone’s going to live like this forever although in the beginning of this in 2020 I wouldn’t
have thought it’d be a year and a half later either so I don’t know um I guess
I just don’t think that you know the top what do you what do what do you say the top five or six things are that the
state does the type the worst thing that government’s always done to us war the drug war taxation central bank
government schools intellectual property i know not everyone thinks it should be up there but those things right the
permanent things um I just don’t think that CO is going to be up there forever the response but um
if it is I think we’re screwed you know uh luckily we have an international system right so everyone’s
treating it differently like even Denmark and some other countries I think are are some of these other countries
are ending their lockdowns now even the UK refused to do one the other day uh to escalate it so maybe that fact will keep
us from keeping it forever because it will just become too obvious that it’s ridiculous uh I’m just hoping a year
from now we’re you know 90% back to normal maybe I’m being polyiana i don’t know i had talked about vaccine mandates
in March of last year i had talked about uh passports in March of last year uh
but I had actually said that I thought the masks would be gone by July of last year so I was way off on that one um I
wish I wasn’t as right about a lot of this stuff as I was because um
people seem to really like this they are enjoying the mania there are a lot of
people who are re it’s get I hate to say it this way because you know you’re a
successful person i’m a successful person we look we enjoy these I mean we get so much out of doing what we do
there are people out there whose lives are so empty that this actually gave them purpose i I agree it’s it’s it’s an
excuse to pile on like for example I was thinking recently about all these mandates uh like I think Biden or
someone in his administration is proposing um that you have to be vaccinate i think Fouchy proposed that
you have to be vaccinated to travel uh which could be unconstitutional but who
knows but the point is you could almost empathize or understand why they would
want the vaccine mandate um in general if they think it will protect people
okay we don’t agree with the means but you understand it but if you don’t exempt people that have had that have
had COVID and have recovered then it’s not really about protecting people right and for the travel thing
it’s almost like they see an excuse to punish people like it’s a it’s it’s not a way to protect people it’s a way to
hit them when it hurts the most to force them to go along for their social program right so yeah if you really want
to travel this is the price you have to pay you have to get the vaccine first it’s not really about protecting them
right um and they’ve changed their tune of course in the beginning everyone was saying the vaccine was to prevent you
from getting sick maybe not 100% but most people would prevent you from getting sick now they’re saying “Oh no
it was never about preventing you from getting sick now it’s just about reducing the symptoms which I think is still an a huge accomplishment and I
think it does that.” But that wasn’t the story right so now they’re changing their tune and you have Biden even
saying we need to force people to get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated people from the unvaccinated so it’s
like what the hell is your message even you know um
so yeah I’m I guess I’m with you on all this um but I feel like in a way we’re
repeating the same refrain uh we we all know what’s wrong with this
but we’ve been in this for 18 months now yeah the well when you look at like
comments like Lyanna Woo this doctor who used I think she used to be with the CDC
I can’t remember and now she’s she I can’t remember who she’s working for now but she was on Wolf Blitzer and she said
this was a while back she said we really need to use vaccines as a stick and we
need to basically restrict people’s freedom until they take it and you’re hearing that a lot I mean I just heard
an audio from like some hospital administrators out in the out um out
west who were saying we need to make this sound worse than it actually is and it when
you Alex Jones becau you can get real Alex Jones when you hear people talking like that it’s like why do they want
this thing in me so much yeah yeah we’re we’re really at the point now that
I’m expecting to see the term herd immunity like removed like newspeak like
just taken out of any kind of medical text or any conversation and anyone
who’s talking about herd immunity may as well be talking about like a um a geocentric universe
or Yeah yeah I mean
it’s a strange time we’re in you know it’s a strange time and then on top of that this has led to like a complete
ignoring of fiscal sanity right so now we’ve just gone from people kind of
worried a little bit in the background about this huge national debt from three four years ago and now it’s like it’s
doubled and we’re spending like three four five six seven trillion dollars extra and it’s like and we’re finally
seeing it we’re finally seeing that inflation the price inflation that you
we’ve been talking about since 2008 when they started printing trillions yeah and all the Yeah and all these idiots are
saying “Oh it’s a temporary thing it’s because of supply chain uh disruption because of co but it’ll it’ll settle
down it’s like no it’s not settling down it’s it’s um it’s about to happen you know we’re we’re seeing it happen yeah i
mean I just don’t know other than at this point I’m saying that local if
you’re going to take a make a political solution I really think that looking at like hapa what must be done is the thing
you should be doing and not you know just jumping right in hey we need to privatize the schools and everything like that but if you’re in a red area
and local and the local politicians are
of the same mind as you know you know no one should be forced to wear a jab your
should your kid shouldn’t be forced to wear a mask something like that then we really should maybe start working at
local politics and start building up those 10,000 Likensteines that you know Papa talks about of course um but that’s
not going to be good enough for a lot of people who are more impatient and they want something we can do right now um I
mean think about a businessman an employer in Florida right now um they’re
caught between two masters right because they’re being told by Dantis that if they require vaccines they’re going to
be fined and they’re being told by Biden that they must ask for they must insist
on vaccines so they’re they’re screwed what what are they what are you supposed
to do just leave Florida yeah I I know uh fire fire your employees to get below
that 100 employee threshold which is another ridiculous thing about the mandate like why would you exempt small
businesses from if it’s really a pressing issue why wouldn’t it cover all businesses well and considering that
small businesses out outnumber Exactly large businesses i mean but that’s one
of those things is people it’s a very it’s something that libertarians you know like say “Oh well you know if you
can vote with your feet.” Well not everybody can vote with their feet especially business owners business
owners are kind of stuck and business no one has been taking a beating on this in
the last 18 months more than small business owners because No it’s No of course not especially like landlords
right landlords are totally screwed because they’re demonized even though they’re they have to pay the bank for their mortgages
uh for their loans right and service their their buildings and yet they can’t collect rent and they can’t keep keep
people out it’s so you know because the the the banks have political clout and
then the poor have political clout you know they’re going to get protected but the the landlords are stuck in between and
there’s lots of other businesses that that don’t have a high profile that are stuck in between um but you had I think
you had Thomas Massie on when he was suggest he suggested that uh to to to escape the u to evade the
the the Biden mandate that you you ask your employer to treat you like a
contractor which of course is high is just as impractical as saying move change states um but it’s also probably
illegal i mean if you could escape you got 1099 everyone yeah this is why it’s
it’s this is Uber saw this in California you can’t just to call your employees
contractors to escape employment regulations otherwise everyone would do that i mean there there if you fit the
definition of employee you are an employee whether you’re you’re called that or not and if you try to evade it
then you’re evading taxes and regulations and all that you don’t have the option to just say “Oh I’m I’m an I’m a contractor.” um because you’re not
if you’re under the supervision of your company and there are certain criteria by by which you’re an employee so that that won’t work either so that’s futile
i I understand people trying it but most employers are going to say “No screw you.” Or because they’re they’re going
along with the with the propaganda anyway most employers they’re not going to be sympathetic to an employee saying
“Please reclassify me as a contractor.” Well could a say a company has 200
employees or say they have 190 employees could they just split it in half under I
think I think you you you could if they wanted to i actually think something similar to that happened uh when
Obamacare was introduced there were these different man thresholds that um where a certain size of employment base
meant you were subject to the to the regulations of Obamacare so I think like here in Houston there’s a restaurant
chain called Hillstone it’s a national chain it’s not that big but it’s Hillstones it’s kind of an up upscale
and one of their subbrands is called Houston’s which is not related to my city but there’s one here so that
Houston’s restaurant location here next to my house which we’ve gone to for years changed their name two or three
times they they were Hillstone then they were back to Houston’s then they were Hillstone now they’re back to Houston’s again and my understanding is they were
doing that because the corporation was re reorganizing to keep different subsidiaries under these limits to to
evade Obamacare regulations so I suspect some companies will do that for uh any
Biden mandate and then of course the bureaucrats the OSHA will just modify the rules i mean they’ll just change the
threshold down to 50 you know so this is by the way this is
this is one thing I’ve pointed out in my writing and others have too um like hapa
that one of the problems with making law in society by legislation which
administrative law and regulations are a subset um is that it increases uncertainty in society because you never
know what the law is because the government can just change the rule from day to day um if it’s the common law
that evolves and and organically comes about even if it’s an unjust rule it’s kind of like permanent or like slowm
moving so you can predict what it is at least so you can adapt and respond to it and if you change your business model to
to respond to whatever the law is even if you don’t like it then it’s going to be that way and you can you can adapt
but if if they can just change the rules the next day then you never know what’s going on and that’s bad for the economy it’s bad bad for planning it reduces
overall wealth and efficiency and that’s That’s the world we live in now how much
do you think that Bitcoin can help us a lot i think Bitcoin can help a lot because a lot of this just like war is
driven by the ability of the government to spend money that they don’t have right and they can only do that because
um they’re not limited by taxation anymore because of the Federal Reserve and the printing press and I I I have
hope that Bitcoin is going to I think Bitcoin might fix this too right bitcoin fixes so many things in potentially and
if you cut off the government’s printing press I mean how could they have paid for all those people to have the
unemployment benefits and the PPP payments and all this if they didn’t have um um their printing press if you
take the printing press away they’ve got a tax they can’t run a deficit they can’t they they just cannot spend money
they don’t have so I think Bitcoin could put them on a huge budget when you put people on a budget they have to act more
rationally so perhaps they could have changed a lot of this you know if the the if the politicians knew they didn’t
have 1 trillion 2 trillion 5 trillion 7 trillion to throw around to to throw
around it would have affected their calculus it would have had to have had i’m pretty sure it’s safe to say that if
you’re someone who listens to this episode you care about liberty especially individual liberty there’s
also a good chance you’re tired of waiting around for political change tired of being duped by political
parties and filling you with hope and then never coming through if you’re ready to take matters into your own
hands then I want to tell you about a new community called the Nomad Network the Nomad Network is the number one
community for liberty-minded people like us who want to create freedom in our lifetimes by focusing on
entrepreneurship investment and income mobility i’ve been on there for about a week and a half it’s just one person
after another posting their W’s talking about what they have going on and it
just looks like the place to be at this point i’m going to be spending a lot of time on there whether you have an
existing business or you’re looking to start one or simply need to network with like-minded people I think the Nomad
Network is definitely the place for you the best part is it’s free to join just go to www.nomadnetwork.appete
appet see what everyone’s talking about that’s www.nomadnetwork.appete
and open your free account today last year a lot of people were saying that
this reaction to the Corona virus was mostly to make sure
that Trump didn’t get elected and I said “Sure that’s that could be a good
byproduct of it but it was worldwide and this was happening all over the
world.” How do you explain that how do you explain that there were so many that
there were so few countries and so few you know Commonwealths that just didn’t
buy into this and it just seemed to be like I mean let let’s go into conspiracy
theory land here it would look like an orchestrated global effort and then you look at what’s happening in I mean let’s
talk about this Australia have you been following what’s going on in Australia yeah loosely what do you think that I
mean it’s it’s in people are getting beaten in the streets by the police for
bringing their masks down the military are actually patrolling the streets there what the hell’s What is that i
don’t know i think it shows that um these so-called open societies that we always thought were like the West was
more of a liberal tolerant open society um I mean as much of a critic as I’ve
always been of the United States and the Constitution for our worship of it um
there’s something about having our written Constitution and our written bill of rights which which was at least somewhat inspired by some lip service
liberal ideas um has put down some kind of limits at least paper limits on what
the state does here whereas in in the in the other parts of the Commonwealth they never had that right so Australia
probably Canada the UK uh they’re really it shows that it shows the state has no
limits um even the ones that that that you think of as the kinder gentler states i mean I
I don’t know if you watched The Handmaid’s Tale on um I guess whatever
network it’s on but and they show you know the US has become a theocracy a fascist theocracy neo-Christian
theocracy and Canada is this kinder gentler place and when all the all the um all the people that the refugees from
the US go there they get welfare payments to set up their house and to pay their food and it’s so kind and
gentle but Jesus Christ it doesn’t look like that now does it the Commonwealth countries they’re not they’re not so kind in and gentle are they i mean the
the teeth of the state are shiny and sharp even if they hide it sometimes
yeah i just that blatant propaganda for Canada when you have Trudeau who’s just
basically he would have Canada turn into Australia overnight if I’m assuming if
it wasn’t for the fact that the United States is right here next to it that may
be one one thing that’s restraining it in some way um or the fact that that’s a
country full of insane rednecks i don’t think people realize that once you get outside of like the eastern parts of can
of Canada you’re you’re dealing with some serious rednecks that will um that
are pretty tough yeah i I you you kind of wonder if things like this might slowly increase
the odds of secession movements like in the US i mean you know you think of New York as like a as a um as a blue state
blue state right but lots of it is rural and very red um the same with even
California right and um and even Texas has red red blue parts outside of the uh
of the of of the red of the red areas well Dallas and Fort Worth are red and
blue right on top of each other yeah even even Houston where I live uh people think it’s conservative it’s not it’s
it’s um I the impression I get from living here is it’s a bunch of uh um
it’s a bunch of Democrats and a bunch of limousine neoliberal neo-Republican types so it’s it’s pretty it’s pretty
blue here too god I wish they wouldn’t have picked you know that was from the that was from the Gulf War wasn’t it when CNN uh picked those colors oh no
that was from the that was from the Gore Bush election in 2000 when they chose red and blue to represent Bush and Gore
and it’s always confusing to me because I always associate red with commies which would be the Democrats i’ve always
got to flip it in my mind to remember which one’s which yeah but going back to
secession now um yeah I when you talked about secession in January of 2020 it
was basically theoretical yeah texas talks about it all the time even
California brings it up and everything i’m pretty well convinced that we are
going to see it in my lifetime that there is going to be some there something is going to break off in my
lifetime and when one thing breaks off it is just going to it it’ll be dominoes falling well you know what’s heartened
me a little bit is that the federalism we have in the US has has not decayed in
the sense that there’s still a recognition by the feds that the states or the kind of the the fundamental units
here um I mean even Biden has been a little bit frustrated by the some of the
actions of some of the governors he doesn’t like but that’s a recognition on his part that he can’t really control
what they do so and he may like he may butt heads with Florida if his OSHA
mandate conflicts with the state law in Florida what’s going to happen i mean that’s to me it’s a good I mean I’m I
feel sorry for the businessman being caught in the middle but um it still is a is a display of of federalism so every
state maintains its identity and there are some states that have this like even Texas has this sort of this secession
idea built into its makeup um so I think it’s still possible here by the way this
is one reason I’ve always despised these centralist libertarians like the KO types uh like Tim Sander is a good
example that they’ve argued that oh the United States is one country and every
state’s not sovereign they want the federal government to be central supreme
power it’s just straight out of it’s objectivism yeah the objectivists at least they at least admit that they’re
rationalists and um and some of them if you if you ask them like well your opposition to anarchy wouldn’t that
imply that anarchy on the international plane is also bad and we shouldn’t have 200 states we should have one and most
of them if they’re honest they’ll say they’ll they’ll they’ll sort of reluctantly admit yes ideally we want
one world government but in today’s world that wouldn’t be practical it’s like yeah well it’s never practical
dumbass i mean I ran said the moral is the
practical so if you’re admitting something’s not practical maybe it’s immoral and in principle too dumb ass
well one of the places that myself and Scott Horton um diverge is I’m not a
libertarian universalist at all i mean I’m I’m a Hoppian covenant community guy
who just believes that that’s the only way that’s the only way that we’re going to achieve any kind of
libertarianish kind of society is to break it down to as small as possible
and exclude people from it and I mean it’s just and what better example than
the last 18 months i mean you do not want to share a polity with these people i mean it is just insane well not only
that if you imagine a world of 10,000 Likenstein then everyone’s got the power of exit right you can go anywhere you
can you can find your you can find your groove you know you can find your jam you can find your community that you like um it seems to be that would be the
least objectionable even to the left but they have this totalitarian control impulse you know they don’t want people
to be able to escape um their controls but the other reason I think that this hoppian enclave uh this private law
society idea uh makes sense is because it seems to be it’s inevitable
if you are the anarchist like we are which is you don’t believe in the state but you’re not for chaos so one common
criticism of us anarchists is that we don’t believe in law now that’s a false
unfair charge because it’s made by people who either honestly or disingenuously maintain that um law is
not possible without the state i mean they don’t think education or communication or roads or money is
possible without the state so they’re they’re dishonest or they’re stupid but but the point is they equate law with
the state so if we say we’re against the state they think we’re for chaos um um
and so when we anarchists say that there there can’t be law then
we’re kind of taking their side we’re agreeing with them that there can’t be law without the state but we we private
property anarchists believe there would be law but what that means is all the institutions that the state has monopolized
um they would have a private analog not all of them like the drug war would not
but um but education would and roads would right and uh money would so all
these things could and law there would be law and order it just would be done privately so
we libertarians have to believe that there would be private hierarchies and natural authority structures and figures
that would have to emerge to fill the role that the state has co-opted and monopolized we would do a better job of
it it would be more decentralized more focused more tailored more measured more tolerant more reasonable you know
everything about it would be better but it would exist and that would necessarily result in diverse
communities of different types it would necessarily result in that because you you everyone’s not the same and to
imagine a world of bland homogeneity is just absurd you’re going to have clusters of different types of things in
the world if you let people associate freely just like in in the US today with somewhat freedom we have segreg
voluntary segregation you have different you have Chinatown you know you have black neighborhoods you have Hispanic
areas it’s not 100% uniform but you do tend to have people likes tend to
associate with likes uh not just racially or ethnically but by different things class you know religion um
whatever so I think you’re going to have to expect some kind of coagulation some kind of lumpiness in the way things
spread out on the surface of the earth if you allow freedom so you would have
different enclaves and they would have their own rules and customs and traditions yeah i was on Tim P last week
and I had made the comment you know he introduced me as a libertarian podcaster so I was and you might not agree with
this but I was saying that you know when I think of the left I think of chaos when I think of the right I think of
order and I’m thinking of ho I’m thinking about hapa hapa talks
about the right being more about hierarchy and hierarchy brings about order and when you’re destroying
hierarchy is just freaking chaos and I what’s funny is I looked at the comments I had my phone and I’m looking at the
comments and someone said I I thought all libertarians wanted chaos right so that’s what they actually think people
who are non libertarians think that they’re all about chaos yeah and those people are they’re more sincere they just are confused they just don’t know
but uh yeah I actually don’t think I disagree with you on that i used so I used to think when I was younger I used
to think that um the simplistic like the first the first version was simplistic
the Nolan chart idea that uh oh the left believes in personal liberties and the right believes in economic liberties and
we just believe in both that’s not exactly right right um the way I then
the way I thought of it after that was well the left is worse on personal and
economic liberties and the right is bad on both but they’re not as bad as a left and we’re better on both okay and that’s
a better approximation but over time I started thinking well left just means
soft socialist and the right means nothing because conservativism is not
coherent it just means conser and if you think about the Republican party it’s this weird um elomeration of three
groups that have nothing in common you have the neocons and you have the moral majority Christians
and you have the chamber of commerce types which are the best ones i believe the kind of small business free market
types chamber of Commerce types the moral majority types are just kind of loose theocrats and I don’t know why
they’re free market at all and then you have the neocons who are basically wararmongers right and establishment um
crush the anti-fascist sorry so um but now I kind of agree with when Hapa put
it in one of his articles he said the essential definition or the essential characteristics of them is that the left
is inherently egalitarian which is anti-natural anti- nature
because it it’s anti- hierarchy and anti- authority and the right is realistic in other words they re they
recognize that in an in a private society you’re going to have natural hierarchies and natural differences
arise so to that extent I would agree with him and I would take the side of the right so if you define it that way
which I think is loosely analogous to your chaos and order perspective because
if you have egalitarianism you’re going to have chaos because you’re obliterating natural distinctions and
you’re trying to force people into a mold that is not natural you’re going to have chaos um and the right recognizes
order um so I think that the this this this conservative view of respecting
being realistic about the differences between people and allowing natural authority figures and hierarchies to
emerge that would replace and supplant what the state has co-opted is the only way to be and you have to temper that
with some kind of libertarian principles right to not have a theocracy or fascism
or something but um I guess that’s how I see the right and left now is as is um
as ealitarian which is unnatural and destructive versus being realistic about human
nature i’ve really been talking about hapa a lot lately and especially what must be
done we did a I did a live stream with a couple guys where we looked at the last
15 minutes of what must be done the speech that he did for the Mis Institute back in 96 and yes um he was talking
about one of the things that he talked about was on the local level you’re going to need leadership and that there
are natural elites and I think that that makes you and then he has that I guess booklet natural elites intellectuals in
the state yeah and um that’s where you the the ancap the people who are living
in an capistan in their head who can’t who wouldn’t even consider using the what must be done thing because oh it’s
politics and I’m never going to get involved with politics and anyway and that’d be fine if they would just shut
up but but a lot of them are also a lot of them
are opposed to this idea of natural elites they have this sort of and you
see this among the left libertarians right who hate the idea of employment you hate the idea of bossing people
around and um you know they almost give some proof to the criticism that we’re
for chaos because yeah if you oppose every private
elite or authority figure or institution or hierarchy that would emerge in the
vacuum of the state to fill the role that the state has been filling then you’re going to have chaos so there’s
some there’s some um you know there’s some ground to the criticism of us being in favor of chaos if you listen to the
way we’re depicted by the left libertarians who are opposed to this natural elites idea yeah i mean and when
it comes down to how do you define it natural elites are the people in your community that instinctively if there
was a problem people would go to and ask for their advice well well not only that
you have natural elites in different dimensions of society i mean if you have a medical problem you go to someone
who’s known to be a good healer a doctor you know if you have a legal problem you go to a lawyer if you have if you want
to build a building you go to an architect and they have reputations within their communities but they have specialties that’s what the division of
labor and the specialization of labor is about so you have different people that
acquire a reputation and people go to them because they are more they have a higher quality rating basically and so
for dispute resolution the same thing would happen i mean this is the idea of how kings emerged right the kings weren’t like the they weren’t dictators
or desperates they were just the people that were the wise men in town that everyone respected their judgment
authority and if you if you need if two people have a dispute and they don’t want to have to fight about it and have
eternal warfare uh between their clans or between themselves you want to have some neutral third party settle your
dispute so who would you pick someone who’s an idiot i mean a literal idiot or
or a stranger or someone who’s trusted and known and wise and fair and has a reputation to guard i mean it’s just
obvious how these things would emerge in society you were saying that you were hoping that a year down the line that
things would start slowly going back to normal whatever that’s going to look like i mean we can’t get back to normal
um we’re not going to get back to what it was in 2020 January of 2020 there’s going to be remnants of this that are
left over and especially in areas I think you know the federalism that we’ve been talking about you’re New York’s
going to try and keep this going California Illinois those places are going to try and keep this going um as
long as possible do you see it getting getting worse before it gets better
I I I don’t I think that it’s it’s uh it hasn’t improved as quickly as I hoped
because of I think mainly because of Delta this Delta surge which has either happened or given them an excuse to
extend their controls um but I think there’s a growing
and the vaccine in a sense has helped because the more people that get it maybe they have an excuse not to be so
paranoid anymore right i don’t know it’s probably not as much of a panacea as they think but at least it gives them um
it gives them cover to to kind of stop being as as as paranoid as they were before uh so maybe they can stop wearing
masks with they can they can save face a little bit you know by showing their face
um so I don’t know i I guess I’m maybe optimistic but I am hopeful that it will get slowly better over the next uh over
the next six months i’m going let you go man because I know you’re um getting prepared for a long long journey so um
thank you thanks for coming on and um you want to What’s your website again where you steancella.com and my IP
stuff’s at c4sif.org or and uh yeah I thought we were going to talk about your post libertarianism which I’ve been
hearing about which I haven’t heard elaborated yet so may maybe one day we can talk about that oh yeah yeah that’d be cool um also when it comes to
subjects that make people absolutely insane especially libertarians abortion
yep um borders and IP
there’s Yeah i mean it’s just and I I’ve we’ve done we’ve done a couple episodes
on IP we actually did an episode on China and IP and um yeah nothing makes
nothing people as insane as that i mean of those three IP is the easiest because the answer is so clear once you see it
abortion is always going to be an intractable issue and um although I
think that there’s a pretty easy libertarian political approach to it and borders is also very difficult and it
probably will be difficult until the state is radically minimized we have decentralization as long as we have a big democratic welfare state uh the
immigration issue will always be a problem because if you have open borders you’ll have problems and if you don’t have open borders you have problems so
there’s really no solution as long as you have the state which is why the anarchist approach is the only one
really for the intractable problem intractable problems thanks a lot man safe travels thanks
Pete i want to thank you for tuning in to the Freeman Beyond the Wall podcast i
want to thank Stefon for coming on the show that’s it we’ll be back in a few days with another episode take care and
platform [Music]
I agree with you that both DeSantis and Biden are wrong in their proclamations towards private property owners, but yeah I’d rather have a local executive mandate normality than a Federal executive mandate increased tyranny. We could have the same discussion about Gov. Abbot.