≡ Menu

More annoyances

People who say “I was taken back” instead of “taken aback”. Don’t use fancy expressions if you have no real idea of what they really are.

Recipes that call for chicken stock. I have no idea what chicken stock is. I only have cans of broth.

Recipes that say to use a “broiler”. what the heck is a “broiler”? I have an oven. It has a broil feature, but I have no idea when it it to be used, and whether that means I have “a broiler” or not. Sheesh.

Recipes that refer to a pot as a “sauce pan”. I always thought there were pots, and pans. Pans are the low-rimmed things you can fry in. Pots are the deeper things you can boil in. So what in the world is a sauce PAN? Obviously what is meant is a pot, why not call it one.

I hate people. They’re such idiots.

Share
{ 0 comments }

Hoppe on Health

A recent thread on Chronicles where Hoppe’s views were mischaracterized; I attempted to set the record straight.

Share
{ 0 comments }

Voicemail peeves

I hate long outgoing voicemail messages that waste the caller’s time by having to listen to pointless information. I like it short and sweet: “Please leave a message” is good enough. Or, “I’m not here: here’s the beep.” My wife hated the one I left on our home voicemail, it said “LEAVE … A … MESSAGE” in a robotic voice.

Why do people need to say, “I’m not in right now, but if you leave a message, I’ll try to get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you for calling, and have a nice day.” I want to tear what’s left of my hair out when I have to suffer through such meandering, time-wasting crap like that. Why do you even need to say, “you’ve reached the Kinsellas.” Duh. If it’s a stranger or wrong number, why give them your name? If it’s someone who you want calling you, they already know your name.

Also annoying is when people say, “I’m unavailable to answer the phone right now.” Look, you can say “I’m unavailable” or you can say “I’m unable to answer the phone,” but what the hell does “unavailable to answer the phone” mean?

Share
{ 0 comments }

BURGER KING MARCUS IS GAY!

BK MARCUS IS A HOMOSEXUAL FROG HUMPER!!!

(gotcha again, Mr. IT Expert!! ha ha ha ha)

Share
{ 0 comments }

Catholicism vs. Austrian Economics and Libertarianism

A recent post on LewRockwell blog lately about this and Thomas Woods versus Thomas Fleming, Storck, et al.; a Chronicles blog thread I participated in with Fleming et al. Here’s another thread I participated in with Scott Richert about the non-aggression principle.

Other recent LRC posts:

Girls and Monkeys

Exponential Progress

ALOHA! LET MY PEOPLE GO (about Hawaii)

Green Nukes

Yet More on Galambos (on Galambos, engineers, and scientism)

Federal Rights and Federal Power (naivety of libertarians wanting the feds to protect our “rights”)

World Investment Court

Share
{ 0 comments }

Yet More on Galambos

From LRC Blog:

Yet More on Galambos

Posted by Stephan Kinsella on May 24, 2004 12:02 AM

Tim Swanson’s blog linked to Isaac Waisberg’s blogpost regarding the nonsensical nature of the owning-a-word mentality. Waisberg links to a Harry Browne Liberty article on Galambos. What a crankish nutball.Browne writes: “A few years later, I realized that the inability to conduct controlled, repeatable experiments made it impossible to transfer the methods of the physical sciences to the social sciences — including economics and investments. Still later, I came across Ludwig von Mises’ The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science, in which he explains this point better than I could.”

This reinforces what I’ve come to think about Galambos: he adopts the monist, scientistic mentality which Mises showed to be flawed. He is like many engineers I’ve known: most are bright, but nowadays uneducated beyond calculus and applied engineering courses; yet they believe that, because they are the “best and brightest” they can solve social problems by some kind of brute force empirical-practical engineering type solution. The result is almost always embarrassing, totally devoid of any familiarity with philosphy or the relevant literature; it is just a step above the long-winded “I’ve-got-the-world-figured-out” diatribes by frustrated truck drivers who also think they have a system to win the lottery. Galambos was brighter and better read than most engineers, but he could not escape the pseudo-science of scientism into which engineers are immersed; he adopted the idea that we should find a “science” of liberty, with “science” used in the conventional, natural-sciences sense. Kind of a weird combination of California surfer-dude “hey-man” mentality combined with Carl Sagan wide-eyed love for (natrual)-science combined with the engineer’s misplaced confidence in his ability to solve all human problems using engineering techniques.

Galambos was wrong. He should have read Mises.

Galambos’s entire philosophy rests on the shaky grounds of scientism. To the extent I can understand what he really meant, that is. Because of his crankish views, he self-censored and doomed himself to dwindling cult status. Wow, man, like wow. Really impressive. Not.

I have to give Galambos his props, however: look at this great slogan he promulgated: “If you vote, don’t complain.” Now that’s brilliant!

Coda: Writes Tim Swanson): “So true. All of my roommates have been engineers as have most of my friends. Rather than reading any sort of economics text they simply come up with a “plan” utilizing some sort of top-down approach.”

Share
{ 0 comments }

Foundation for Economic Excitement

In a recent LRC blog post, Day of the Long Knives (alt link), I discussed some of FEE’s colorful past. Below is a less-sanitized version of that post.

***

I confess I never cared much for Leonard Read’s books—what a friend calls “grandfather libertarianism.” My eyes glaze over at meaningless, pop or cutesy titles like To Free or to Freeze, The Freedom Freeway, Talking to Myself, and How Do We Know? I never could finish them; the little hardbacks, not much longer than pamphlets, cost only a dollar or so, and have sat on my shelf for over a decade now, collecting dust. (The same goes for Isabel Paterson’s The God of the Machine, and Rose Wilder Lane’s The Discovery of Freedom, which I could just not get through. Patterson’s too-dated over-reliance on proto-New Age metaphors of “circuits” and “energy” drove me, as an electrical engineering student, batty.)

Not that I frown on those who come to libertarianism through Read or others; the more, the merrier. In any event, though Read may be boring, the same can hardly be said of FEE in recent years. Most recently, there was whole Mark Skousen presidency debacle.

There was also an interesting episode in the late ’90s. At the time Hans Sennholz was President. The November 1996 issue of The Freeman (now Ideas on Liberty) contained a Book Review by Hans-Hermann Hoppe of The Failure of America’s Foreign Wars (edited by Richard M. Ebeling and Jacob G. Hornberger).

In the review, Hoppe pointed out that Hitler was relatively benign before World War Two compared to Stalin; Stalin had killed 20 million of his own people before the war, whereas Hitler did not start killing many people until after the war started. This true statement, unsurprisingly, angered certain people, including Israel Kirzner, then on the FEE Board of Trustees.

Next came Robert W. McGee‘s article Arab Terrorism: Causes and Cure, in the December 1996 issue of The Freeman, about the systematic violation of Palestinian human rights by the Israelis. McGee merely pointed out that Palestinians have been having their land stolen and have been subjected to numerous other human rights abuses since the 1940s, with the help of American taxpayers. As McGee wrote:

The Palestinians’ property right, one of the most basic of all human rights, was systematically disparaged. The disparagement continues to this day, as evidenced by the West Bank settlement policies of the present Israeli government. Russian Jews and others are being given Palestinian land to live on, and the Palestinian owners are being driven from their land without compensation. … The land grab is only one of many human rights abuses that the Palestinians have endured. … [N]o government should ever condone or financially support a regime that systematically disparages them. Once U.S. support stops, Arab terrorists (some of whom may legitimately be called freedom fighters) will be far less likely to attack U.S. property and citizens. … Muslims, Jews, and Christians can live in peace, but only when human rights, including property rights, are respected.

Kirzner, angered over the two articles, resigned from the Board of Trustees. Hans Sennholz, then the president of FEE, fired Larry White, the editor of the November issue in which Hoppe’s book review appeared; Robert Batemarco, the book review editor; and Robert Higgs, the editor of the December issue, in which McGee’s article apeared.

So at this point it appeared that Hoppe, McGee, White, Higgs, and Batemarco were persona non grata with FEE, and Kirzner had quit. It’s said that several FEE supporters were outraged by Sennholz’s craven, politically-correct actions. Some theorize that Sennholz felt compelled to act this way partly to atone for his serving as a Luftwaffe pilot for Hitler during World War Two.

One ironic aspect of this is that White, who has disagreed with Hoppe over free banking issues, was fired for publishing Hoppe’s book review.

And I haven’t even gotten to the part about the father-in-law having an affair with his daughter-in-law, who ends up committing suicide. Wait, woops, I think that’s Hillsdale 1  I’m thinking of. Nevermind.

  1. See, in Liberty magazine: Is It True What They Say About Hillsdale?The Truth About HillsdaleThe Lessons of Hillsdale, R.W. Bradford; Hillsdale as an Ordinary College, Robert Campbell; Hillsdale and the Standards of Liberty.  []
Share
{ 1 comment }

MAKE THE PIE HIGHER

Recent post on LRC Blog about Bushisms.

Another recent post, Property in the Law, quotes some interesting civil-law language on the nature of property rights from Professor Yiannopoulos’s treatise.

Another post discusses C.S. Lewis’ comments on women fighting in battle.

Share
{ 0 comments }

To Footnote or Not To Footnote

Although I personally like footnotes and find them indispensible in academic writing (and much better than endnotes, which I despise), I’ve always liked the following comments by Bryan Garner, in The Elements of Legal Style (page 93). Garner notes that although footnotes can usefully refer you to other references, “you can hardly ignore, at the foot of every page, the notes that ‘run along, like little angry dogs barking at the text.’ These days, the notes are more likely Great Danes than chihuahuas.” [Quoting S.M. Crothers, “That History Should Be Readable,” in The Gentle Reader 172 (1903; repr. 1972).

Share
{ 1 comment }

More on Huebert and DeCoster

Huebert and Karen both chimed in again on this topoic. Karen writes, “I love sports, and more than just tennis, as another libertarian chides in on this. (By the way, tennis is the only sport where the women are far better to watch than the men. The volleying and net play is much better, and the woman’s game is more competitive and spirited.)”

I would say this: well, women’s volleyball is better than men’s. As for tennis, men’s used to be better; but as they and rackets got more and more powerful, the men’s game became more and more boring. Now the women are like the men (think: Borg, Lendl, McEnroe, Connors) used to be. I am also partial to LSU college football, I have to admit.

Share
{ 0 comments }

Huebert & De Coster on Friends and Sports

I might as well get into this back-and-forth between Huebert and De Coster. I tend to agree w/ Huebert about the execrableness of Friends and those who watch professional sports (tennis excepted). Except Jennifer Aniston’s repeated appearances in tight shirts w/ no bra.

Share
{ 0 comments }

The Fourth Estate and other annoying things

When people refer to the media as “the fourth estate”. That irks me. It’s almost as bad as “salad days” or “bumper crop”.

Also, people who name their kids wrong-sex (Gail, Leslie, Evelyn), or titular names, like “Judge” or “Gouvernor”.

Share
{ 0 comments }

© 2012-2026 StephanKinsella.com CC0 To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to material on this Site, unless indicated otherwise. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.

-- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright