In Anarcho-Capitalism and Intellectual Property Right, The Vincenton Post (December 10, 2009), some Objectivist nym attacks my anti-IP views (citing Greg Perkins). He writes: “Now let me reproduce here the argument made by Greg Perkins against some Libertarian scholars against intellectual property. Perkins wrote the following:” …
Consistency FAIL!
Stephan Kinsella is a libertarian writer and patent attorney in Houston, Texas. He has published widely on various areas of libertarian legal theory and on legal topics such as intellectual property law and international law. His publications include Legal Foundations of a Free Society (Papinian Press, 2023), Against Intellectual Property (Mises Institute, 2008), and International Investment, Political Risk, and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner’s Guide (Oxford, 2020).
The Libertarian Standard (TLS)
© 2012-2024 StephanKinsella.com 
To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to material on this Site, unless indicated otherwise. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a 
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.
He also wrote these anti-an-cap blogs:
http://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/quo-vadis-ludwig-von-mises/
http://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/anarcho-capitalism-a-whim-worship-ideology/
http://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/05/06/anarcho-capitalism-vs-liberty-why-objective-law-is-necessary/
http://fvdb.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/on-anarcho-capitalism/
Wow. What an angry guy. Lots of name calling and no arguments. I think I’ll stay with the civilized Mises-crowd, anarchists or not.
What a joke!
This cretin was contradicted by everybody in his comment section, and he ended up banning them because he didn’t want to “sanction Anarcho-Capitalists” by allowing them to contradict him.
The boy is completely driven insane by Rand’s echo chamber.
Thanks for sharing. What a palserue to read!
It’s funny how morons like Vincent make the claim that because Roy Childs recanted some of his ideas that makes those ideas invalid. And they claim reason as their guide. Wow.