Stefan Molyneux Discussing UPB and (briefly) Argumentation Ethics and Estoppel

by Stephan Kinsella on August 27, 2011

Here’s Stefan Molyneux at PorcFest 2011 at a Students for Liberty Q&A, discussing his Universally Preferable Behavior theory, and briefly fielding a question about Hoppe’s argumentation ethics and my estoppel theory (go to about 20:38):

(audio; mp3)

[VIDEO NOW LONGER AVAILABLE; user’s account suspended]

{ 4 comments… add one }

Spirit Splice August 27, 2011, 12:03 pm

Lost all respect for Moly. Check out how someone who disagrees or asks for clarification gets treated by a supposed libertarian.

http://www.fdrliberated.com/?p=7121

http://board.freedomainradio.com/forums/t/29310.aspx?PageIndex=1

↩ ∞
Rudd-O August 27, 2011, 4:45 pm

The previous commenter has been consistently spreading slanderous accusations to the effect that Freedomain Radio is supposedly a “cult”, supported by a group of people explicitly established to maliciously slander Freedomain Radio and Stefan himself, rather than refute the *arguments* advanced by Stefan and other voluntaryists.

The fact that he would include non-sequitur links in his slander, in a comment about Hoppe’s argumentation ethics and Stefan’s views on them, I think pretty well establishes his true motives.

I suggest that whoever is reading this disregard the malicious accusations spread by the above individual. Thanks.

↩ ∞
- Spirit Splice August 27, 2011, 6:18 pm
  
  Or they could look at both sides of the argument and decide for themselves like a rational person would do as opposed to ignoring critical material because of a cheerleading rant posted by someone like you.
  
  I just came across those links this week, interesting synchronicity if I do say so. UPB contains at least one massive logical flaw in it, as the young lady pointed out in the above thread (that got her banned without warning as were those who agreed with her take).
  
  When I first found Moly, I liked what he said but could not quite trust his energy. Something fishy, company, cointel about him. Those links show a bit of it. Any other agendas they may have are not relevant to the criticisms they put forth, nor are the relevant to the treatment of Noesis on the FDR board.
  
  Read the thread for yourself and then you decide.
  
  ↩ ∞
vosa June 21, 2012, 10:45 am

I just read the stuff Spirit Splice put, it is such a load of bull, no argument what so ever… take a look for you self.

↩ ∞